Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

(Download) "Ardis O. Smart v. Robert A. Heinze" by United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. # eBook PDF Kindle ePub Free

Ardis O. Smart v. Robert A. Heinze

📘 Read Now     📥 Download


eBook details

  • Title: Ardis O. Smart v. Robert A. Heinze
  • Author : United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
  • Release Date : January 19, 1965
  • Genre: Law,Books,Professional & Technical,
  • Pages : * pages
  • Size : 57 KB

Description

Appellant is a prisoner incarcerated in Folsom Prison. On July 20, 1964, appellant filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Northern Division, pursuant to the Civil Rights Act, 28 U.S.C. ? 1343 and 42 U.S.C. ? 1983, seeking damages and other equitable relief against the warden of Folsom Prison, appellee herein. In his complaint it is alleged that appellant prepared a petition for to be submitted to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Northern Division; that the resident notary public at the prison refused to notarize the petition upon the ground that it was not prepared on forms as required by Rule ND5 of the Rules of Practice of that court; that thereafter appellant attempted to mail the petition without notarization; and that the petition was not mailed, but was returned to him by prison officials on the ground that it did not comply with the requirements of Rule ND5 in that it was not prepared in the questionnaire form required by the Rule At the time of filing of the complaint in the district court, appellant also moved for permission to proceed in forma pauperis, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ? 1915. On July 20, 1964, the District Court for the Northern District of California, Northern Division, entered its memorandum decision and order denying appellants motion to proceed with the action in forma pauperis . The court, by order dated July 29, 1964, denied appellants motion for a rehearing. This court on December 7, 1964, authorized appellant to prosecute this appeal in forma pauperis, and has jurisdiction to hear this appeal under 28 U.S.C. ? 1291.


Download Ebook "Ardis O. Smart v. Robert A. Heinze" PDF ePub Kindle